1.(2000 words) critically analyse Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562 (focus on the judgments of McHugh and Kirby only) Structure should be:

I Introduction 200 words

II Facts 400 words

III Ratio Decidendi 50 words

IV Obiter Dictum 50 words

V Reasoning 500 words

VI Policy Issue 500 words

VII Conclusion 200 words

2.(4000 words)Without a Bill of Rights, or the political will to introduce one, the Australian judiciary may utilise the principle of legality as a means of protecting fundamental rights. Critically evaluate this and other options for the Australian legal system to protect fundamental human rights. Structure should be :

I Introduction : 1 General Issues 2 Specific Issues (400 words)

II Background/Definitions: seperation of power/stare decisis/ judicial activism (500 words)

III The Law 1.Introductory para 2.Relevant (1000 words)

IV Analysis 1.Introductory para 2. Judicial Activism 3.seperation of powers: 1.Role of judges 2.Role of legislations

and recommendations/solutions (2000 words)

VI Conclusion (200 words)

Get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon

Order Now

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp