In June 2005, a team of four U.S. Navy SEALs set out on a reconnaissance mission in Afghanistan, near the Pakistan border. The target was a Taliban leader & an individual close to Osama Bin Laden, who commanded at least 140 heavily armed fighters stationed in a small nearby village. As they took position, the four soldiers were discovered by a pair of Afghan goat farmers and a 14-year-old boy. With no means to secure the civilians, the SEALs were left with a difficult dilemma: to kill the unarmed civilians and secure the integrity of the mission or allow the unarmed civilians to go free with the potential of having their presence & location compromised.

What solution would a Utilitarian argue for? What would a Kantian conclude? What would a Virtue Ethicist advise them to do? Which argument do you most agree with and why?

Get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp