Name two different methods for evaluating evidence. Compare and contrast these two methods.
There are many ways to evaluate evidence in nursing. Qualitative and quantitative research can both be used to judge the quality of evidence. A primary goal of qualitative research is to learn as much as possible about the people who will be participating in it. Methods for getting quality information that does not cost anything include (Park & Park, 2016). However, they do not worry about statistical measurements but rely on their ability to comprehend and analyze actual data. Hypotheses and creative thinking originate from them. You can count, synthesize, and even digitalize qualitative data. To do this, you must first analyze the data to discover patterns and new information. The onto-epistemological assumptions of a researcher can have a significant impact on how they approach qualitative data analysis (Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., and Vaara, E. (2018). It provides suggestions or hypotheses for possible quantitative studies. Focus groups, in-depth interviews, and document reviews are all examples of qualitative research. To describe a problem or condition from the point of view of persons experiencing it, qualitative research is best suited. Statistical tests are used to analyze the more text-based data. The validity and reliability of the study can be influenced primarily by the measurement equipment or instrument that is employed. By creating numerical data or useful statistics, quantitative research attempts to put a number on a problem’s severity. The research relies on measurable data to establish facts and identify trends in the study. In addition to traditional approaches like questionnaires and interviews, there are a variety of newer technologies available, such as web-based interceptors, online polls, paper surveys, mobile surveys, in-person interviews, and more. Quantitative and qualitative methods are commonly used by academics from a variety of fields, and the assumption is that “no claim of compatibility, much less of synthesis, can be supported” (Park, J., & Park, M. 2016).
Bansal, P. (Tima), Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189â€“1195.
Park, J., & Park, M. (2016). Qualitative versus Quantitative Research Methods: Discovery or Justification? Journal of Marketing Thought, 3(1), 1â€“7. https://doiorg.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.15577/jmt.2016.03.01.1
****Please respond to The following post……