Explain 3 common interventions to improve communication and trust. (refer to your textbook, chap 6).

150 Words APA format

Books Required Group Dynamics and Team Interventions: Understanding and Improving Team Performance Author: Timothy M. Franz

Justify the fundamental reasons that marketers should closely monitor the actions of rivals in order to proactively address developing issues, events, and circumstances. Provide one (1) example of such successful close monitoring to support your rationale.

Evaluate the value afforded by Lehmann and Winer’s Level of Competition Model as an instrument for engendering the accurate identification and understanding of competition within the health care industry. Provide at least two (2) specific examples of Lehmann and Winer’s Level of Competition Model that apply within a health care organization with which you are familiar.

Books Required Group Dynamics and Team Interventions: Understanding and Improving Team Performance Author: Timothy M. Franz ISBN: 978-1405186773 Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell, (2012)

reading Assignment: Chapters 6 – 8 in your Textbook.

2. Discussion Question: List and explain the 7 steps of problem-solving and decision-making. (refer to your textbook, chap 8)

Write a paper using APA Format

Outline the process for developing nursing standards of practice, and identify the different entities that might be involved in developing a standard of practice.

Outline the process for developing nursing standards of practice, and identify the different entities that might be involved in developing a standard of practice.

Assessment 1: Written Essay:

Inter-professional Practice & Patient Safety

Word Limit: 2000 words

Aim:

The purpose of this essay is to enable you to critically evaluate current research about adverse events in the acute environment. You will examine nursing strategies that can be used to prevent adverse events in a hospital including the role of inter-professional practice in promoting patient safety.

This assessment item will address all three (3) learning outcomes for this course.

Task description:

For this task you need to write a 2000-word essay.

1. Choose ONE of the following preventable adverse events options that may occur whilst a patient is in hospital:

a. Medications errors

b. Clinical management – failure to act

c. Hospital acquired infection

2. Write a critical evaluation of current research about adverse events in the acute environment. Note that the term critically evaluate “sometimes called critically analyse or review means to show the essence of something by breaking it down into it is components parts, examining each part in detail and explaining issues…”. It also means making connections and seeing relationships between information. The term critically evaluate also implies to weigh up strengths and weaknesses and judge the worth of the argument or position

3. Your essay MUST include the following components:

a. An opening paragraph that identifies the aim of the assignment (including ONE chosen adverse event from the list below)

b. A definition of an adverse event

c. A discussion of the prevalence of your chosen adverse event in an Australian hospital setting

d. An analysis of the identified topic’s effects or consequences on the patient, patient’s family and health care system

e. A critical evaluation of TWO nursing strategies involving inter-professional practice that may be used to prevent the chosen adverse event

f. A discussion of the potential barriers in achieving the chosen identified strategies in a hospital setting

g. A discussion about how the nurse may overcome the potential barriers in a hospital setting to promote patient safety

h. A conclusion with a final paragraph summarising the central points of your essay.

i. A Reference list formatted to APA6 style.

j. Reference to a minimum of 10 journal articles no more than five years old.

Other elements:

· Word limits for all assignments needs to be strictly adhered to. The word limit for an assessment item includes in text citations, tables and quotations. The word limit does not include the reference list. Please note the marker will cease marking your submitted work once they have reached the allocated word limit.

·

· Ensure that you use scholarly literature (digitised readings, research articles, relevant Government reports and text books) that have been published in in the last 5 years.

· Write in the third person and use academic language throughout.

· Refer to the marking criteria when writing your assignment. This will assist you in calculating the weightings of the sections for your assignment.

MARKING CRITERIA WRITTEN ESSAY

CRITERION ONE: Introduction

· Concise, opening paragraph that identifies the aim of the assignment (6)

· Defines an adverse event (4)

10

CRITERION TWO: Knowledge & Context

· Discuss the prevalence of one (1) chosen adverse event in an Australian hospital setting (6)

· Analyse the chosen preventable adverse event effects on the patient, patient’s family and health care system (14)

20

CRITERION THREE: Critical evaluation

· Critical evaluation of two (2) nursing strategies involving inter-professional practice that may be used to prevent the chosen adverse event (24)

Note: each strategy critically evaluated will be 12 marks. You may include the patient safety element in each strategy.

· Discuss the barriers in achieving the chosen identified strategies in a hospital setting (10)

· Present a clear description on how the nurse may overcome the barriers in a hospital setting and promote patient safety (10)

44

CRITERION FOUR: Presentation and Structure

· Presents essay in a logical manner

· Adheres to word limit of 2000 words

· Uses academic language throughout

· Essay is well presented, with correct spelling, grammar, and well-constructed sentence and paragraph structure

10

CRITERION FIVE: Referencing5

· Essay is supported with no fewer than 10 scholarly relevant sources from the last 5 years.

· In-text citations are appropriate and correct

· Referencing as per APA 6th Edition

10

CRITERION SEVEN: Conclusion

· Has a concluding paragraph that summarises the overall argument in the assessment.

· Does not introduce any new information in the conclusion

6

Total Marks

[ weighted at 50%]